To me the m4 seems like not to good of a gun. What do you guys/girls think? It almost seems that the m16 was better than the m4.
Posted in Military Rifles
Why Weapons Aren't Enough to Keep Your Family Safe? Read More...
Which is the most effective home defense weapon for a home invasion:
Click Here
to learn about the pro's and con's of each as well as the biggest mistake all the "heavy artillery" guys make when choosing "terminator ammo"!
(Hint: It has nothing to do with "stopping power" but it's nearly as important to your family that you get this right! Not doing so could cost you a lifetime of grieving that no law-abiding family should suffer...EVER!) Read More...
January 13th, 2010 at 8:00 am
the m4 is a good carbine, and it beats the hell out of the m16. 99% of our operations over there are in urban terrain, with the m4 you can move through a doorway with it up and ready, with an m16 you need to keep it down until your in the room already just because of its size.
i think the military is currently looking into the SCAR, which is a pretty bad ass weapon. IMO though they should go with SOCOM IIs, they’re easy to modify so they have as little kick (if not less) than an m4, its a larger round (which has its plusses and minuses. it wont be as effective against body armor but it will pack a bigger punch), and they’re more accurate. close to the same size too, which is crucial if your in a vehicle or moving room to room.
January 13th, 2010 at 8:00 am
Yes they need a new rifle and pistol. The M16 and the M4 should be replace with a rifle that utilizes a guide rod to increase its reliability. H&K and Sig both have good models. As far as pistol a 1911a1 .45 acp still beats anything else that is being used