I thought it was all pretty good and of high quality:
Tokarev Pistol -Pistols don’t win wars, but it was reliable in dirt and dust, unlike the Luger.
Ppsh-41 Submachine Gun: Reliable, Chrome lined barrel, and double the shots of the MP-40.
Moisin-Nagant Rifle: Too long, but no bolt action rifle has reliability problems. Used en bloc clip, but so did half the bolt action military rifles on Earth. Reliable.
DP machine gun. Delicant magazine pan, and magazine had tendency to overheat. Otherwise reliable
The SG-43 Goryunov: Excellent in all ways.
Maxim 1910: 150 pounds with carriage and shield, but reliable.
Soviet Anti Tank Guns: OK, here was a failing. They never developed infantry hollow charge anti tank weapons.
Soviet Artillery: The Soviets had a very effective 76.2mm anti tank gun early in the war which the Germans did not. Soviet 76mm, 122mm and 152 mm field weapons were simple and effective. The 120mm mortar was so good the Germans copied it. 57mm/85mm anti aircraft guns effective.
T-34/76 Tank. Better armor/gun/gun pressure/power/reliablity than Panzer III/IV. And could be produced ten to one.
T-34/85 Tank. Match for Panther/Tiger. And could be produced ten to one.
SU-85/SU/-100/SU-152 Cheap simple, well armored, well armed Assault Guns that were easy to manufacture.
KV-1/Joseph Stalin Tanks: Excellent armor and effective tanks.
Sturmovik: Outstanding Ground Attack Aircraft
Yak-3 /Yak-9
Lavochkin-5/ Lavochkin-7 Fighter Planes-Excellent manueverability and Power. Superior perfomance under 5,000 meters. Somewhat undergunned.
Russian weaknesses were: Very poor training, terrible supply, terrible food/clothing, terrible leadership early in the war, lack of concern over high death rates. But I think most equipment was good.
Russian equipment weaknesses were: No effective high altittude fighter planes (but they didn’t need any), no strategic bombers, no effective Navy or production of escort ships for convoys.
Share This