Taking into account our available modern technology, i.e. availability of weapons that can wipe out whole countries, speed of deployability. Once the president has begun his 30 military control for policing action and started a war-like conflict, congress can’t very well have us pull out in the middle of the conflict, can they?
Posted in military weapons | 2 Comments »
The president can deploy troops and authorize military strikes without approval of congress, can the president use nuclear weapons in this way as well?
If the USA was *believed* to be under nuclear attack (ICBMs inbound), does the POTUS have full authority to launch a nuclear retaliation?
Posted in military weapons | 1 Comment »
What if we are already at war and our military decides the use of nuclear weapons is needed? Does the military need an approval from Congress in which weaponry is used?
Can the President override Congress on military issues?
Posted in military weapons | 6 Comments »
when it is the gun owners that are protecting our rights from the government. Without the guns, we would have no rights.
The military is the government and business thugs, or strong arms. Congress never declared war.
Oh I’m sorry girls, I thought the constitution had some meaning. It was not designed to protect us from other countries, but from our government! Grow up!
Some ding bats think that todays military is the same as WWII’s. That was our last declared war!
Posted in military guns | 16 Comments »
Do Americans really believe their brother and neighbors in the military would turn on them?
And what would be the point to becoming a fascism? The government wouldn’t want that any more than the citizens. So why do people constantly refer to that ridiculous reason to have guns?
Ps, if or some bizarre reason the military did attack the general populace, a bunch of obese people with hand guns will not stop them.
If there are people in the US crazy enough to believe this, should they still be allowed to own a gun? Even when they talk about shooting up congress?
Posted in military guns | 13 Comments »
For example, if we cut the F22 Raptor, we will save billions, but lose thousands of jobs involved in manufacturing the plane. Will congress allow jobs to be lost in their districts/states in order to save taxpayer money and cut un-needed programs?
Posted in military weapons | 1 Comment »
Basically Congress wants to spend millions of possibly even billions on dollars on new guns even though our own military is saying thats a crap idea since our guns are just fine right now and the new stuff arent that great either.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24229068
Posted in military guns | 7 Comments »
Why Weapons Aren't Enough to Keep Your Family Safe? Read More...
Which is the most effective home defense weapon for a home invasion:
Click Here
to learn about the pro's and con's of each as well as the biggest mistake all the "heavy artillery" guys make when choosing "terminator ammo"!
(Hint: It has nothing to do with "stopping power" but it's nearly as important to your family that you get this right! Not doing so could cost you a lifetime of grieving that no law-abiding family should suffer...EVER!) Read More...