What are some valid points?

February 7th, 2011 by eranio

I am an avid shooter and fire arm collector. I have been shooting from almost 25 years now. I am in the military. I do compete in some shooting competitions(not professionally nor am I a sponsored shooter). I am asking though what are some valid points of why people should not be able to possess firearms? Not possess silencers / suppressors? Not possess semi-automatic pistols, rifles, and shotguns? Not possess assault rifles (semi automatic rifles or not always considered assault rifles? Not possess fully automatic rifles?? I am not going to be foolish. I do agree not everyone should possess a fully automatic rifle nor does everyone need to. Some people own them cause they are fire arm collectors and like to allow public citizens a chance to shoot some military firearms. There are shooting events across the country where people can pay to shoot rounds through an automatic rifle. I also know some of you are saying why do people need suppressors if they are not going to do anything wrong. Again some people just want to own it so they can. I collect weapons from ww ii and vietnam.

Posted in military firearms | 5 Comments »

the .270 Vs. the .308. Need experienced hunter/shooters to weigh in?

November 20th, 2010 by eranio

Now as far as the cartridge is concerned and the choice of game being medium game, how can i be sure to choose the right bullet so I don’t end up "limited" to deer only for instance. I know the .270 shoots a flatter trajectory at longer ranges which is good, but the 270 ammo vs the 308 is more expensive.

So could i hunt the same kinds of animals with either or these bullets? and if i wanted to hunt elk or moose which caliber would be the better bet for my ticket? A 30-06 is not for me.

These are the two rifles im currently looking at.

REMINGTON 700 ADL .270 RIFLE
349.99

And

WEATHERBY VG1 .308 RIFLE
399.99

Ive read that both cartiridges can be "limiting". Im referring to these statements.

"I would buy a Remington 700 SPS, but in 308 caliber and not 30-06. No need to limit yourself on the bullet weights available for 30-06 when you can have a more varied number of different styles and bullet weights in 308. "

From JD. A yahoo answerer

Gunsmith/Gun Shop Owner-Dealer
Custom Rifle Builder
Long Range Competition Rifle Team Member 16 years
Firearms Appraiser & Military Firearms Collector
NRA Life Member/Retired LEO
35 Years Firearms Experience

And
Missileman over at thefiringline.com

Who says

"I’d go with the 270, mainly because it may give you a little more flexibility in the future. It would make a much better antelope gun if you ever choose to hunt those, and has probably taken as many elk as any round out there."

Now to rationalize is this a discussion. Is this something similiar to a .38 spl and a .357 discussion in thinking of terms of, experience, shooting, other training factors etc etc? Or what?
Weatherby imports?? Hadnt heard anything on that.. Oh one more thing. Ive also heard Weatherby rifles ONLY shoot Weatherby ammunition? Did i hear this right?

Your answers have been a great addition to all of the information i’ve collected thus far. Kudos to YOU guys!

Posted in military firearms | 8 Comments »

Best place to learn how to operate military firearms in MA/RI?

September 30th, 2010 by eranio

Going into USMC, want to learn how to operate M16 and other military firearms.

Posted in military firearms | 2 Comments »

What kind of guns are these?

July 4th, 2010 by eranio

NUMBER1. http://www.gunboards.com/images/kp44pistol_000.JPG

NUMBER2.

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bdlltd.com/1330-Universal_M1-WWII_comm.-left_side.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.bdlltd.com/military_firearms%2520MODERN.htm&h=600&w=800&sz=69&hl=en&start=14&sig2=Yugs2n_mm6erBQYrcqqyFA&um=1&tbnid=l7egaDLo8AT0MM:&tbnh=107&tbnw=143&ei=cJTER5C4EaPgeK_nueQN&prev=/images%3Fq%3DM1%2Bin%2BWWII%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den

Posted in military firearms | 6 Comments »

What should I do with my life? Enlisted Vs Reserve?

July 3rd, 2010 by eranio

24 College degree pretty good shape (i run a lot). No wife, kids, girlfriend, work for the family. Have a slight heart murmur but had complete medical workup and the dr said it is 100 not an issue.

I have always been a shooter (help instruct law enforcement/ military firearms classes), got into mixed martial arts and really like it.

If I was going to be a Marine I would be 0311 active duty. If I was going to go navy I would be a greenside corpsman. I would enlist reserve as that is the only they can guarantee me greenside as a corpsman. I know as a reserve corpsman I would almost hundred percent be activated.

Posted in military firearms | 4 Comments »

If everyone was required to be armed by law would the mall shooting been so bad?

July 1st, 2010 by eranio

Thank God for gun control still providing unarmed targets for the slaughter. This latest mall shooting is proof control fails all people. 50 years ago this would not have been so bad. Most adults would have been armed and able to stop any such event from becoming a mass murder. Proof is in the pudding. Guns don’t kill people, People kill people. If guns were fully legal this would have ended within 2-5 shots at which time only the shooter would have been dead not the 8 plus the shooter that had to die due to a lack of social responsibility to own a firearm and know how to use it. All of our founding fathers were in full support of all people owning and knowing how to use military firearms to protect themselves at all times. Protecting the people is not a job of the police or the government, it is the duty of the people. As the 911 calls prove there was tons of time expire before security or the police responded. Thank you Clinton, Bush and the Patriot Act for failing us all.

Posted in military firearms | 16 Comments »

tough question about enlisment and morals?

June 23rd, 2010 by eranio

I have been conflicted over enlistment, not about the war for personal reasons. religon, friends, my normal life. I look forward to being a soldier. the career i want is in the service, I want to be a weapons seargeant "18 bravo, weapons" whatever u want to call it that is my dream job. I have always had a fascination with the military, firearms, patitisom. these things are everday for me but just cant seem to make up my mind about one thing….is killing for any purpose okay? as a human Iam not always going to agree with everything I do but as a soldier I will do my assigned duty. every since I was young I wanted to be a weapons specialist and infantry soldier but also wanted to be trained in demolitions and inteligence gathering. as well as trained in gureilla warfare. My demon is everything I want in a career has to do with killing people,bad people but people none the less. "is it right to kill another person, can killing one to save a thousand exempt ur soul from the pain
Iam nineteen and have 42 college credits in the major of aviation professional pilot (they do not give out degrees in weapon specialist or warfare in the civialian world). no academys already applied.

Posted in military firearms | 5 Comments »

My 2nd Amendment Rights?

June 21st, 2010 by eranio

What is Mr. Obama’s opinion on my 2nd Amendment rights? I live in "Komyfornia" where every gang member, parolee, and general thug has access to whatever firearm they want, but I, as a law abiding citizen, veteran, and civilian member of law enforcement, am restricted to firearms that "don’t look like military firearms", and have passed an extremely restrictive battery of tests. Basically, anything that looks "military" is called an "assault weapon" and is illegal. I’m so greatful the fine elected folks in my state considered .50 caliber weapons to be the "weapon of choice" for terrorists, and made them illegal. Now if we can just get rid of those pesky shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles, dirty nukes, real assault weapons, and box cutters the terrorists still have access too, we will be in good shape! Distracted "Soccer Mom’s" in SUV’s, cel phone attached to ear, and screaming kids in the back seat cause far more deaths per year than .50 caliber weapons
Thanks to "M C" for thinking girls are the problem. Really "M C", get a clue! "Patrick" gave a better answer to my question. Keeping guns out of our "inner cities" does not stop the problem of violent crime! Criminals will use knives, baseball bats, their fists, or whatever is available to give them the upper hand to pull off their crime. As a country, we need to stop putting the blame on "outside forces" and "mechanical objects" for people doing bad things! When do we start holding people accountable for their actions again? Does anybody file a lawsuit against Ford Motor Company, GMC, Toyota, Nissan, or Mitsubishi if a drunk driver, driving one of those cars, trucks, or SUV’s kills somebody? Do we file lawsuits against Budweiser, Jack Daniels, Southern Comfort, Grey Goose, Pabst Blue Ribbon, or whatever manufacturer of alcohol enabled the drunk driver to get drunk? Why blame firearms manufacturers for the misuse of their products?
In terms of the shooter at VT, the background check system failed. The system failed because a judge decided to give the VT shooter a break at his trial to determine if he was a danger to himself and others when he was at a formidable age. Instead of closing the door on the freak, the colors of "liberal, political correctness" showed themselves, and the judge decided not to institutionalize the VT shooter, and expunge the case so there was no record of it..

The VT shooter was a sick individual, and regardless of his ability to gain access to firearms or not, he would found a way to kill people. Had he stabbed his victims, should we ban knives? Should we create a class of knives deemed "assault knives" or "the knife choice of terrorists"? If the freak at VT had used hefty dirt clods to kill, should we press for the designation of "deadly dirt clods"? When do we start holding people accountable for their actions instead of passing the blame onto everything but the person?

Posted in military firearms | 3 Comments »

Is there a less crazy alternative to the NRA?

March 14th, 2010 by eranio

I’m looking for a less gung-ho and money-hungry organization that preferably focuses more on C&R weapons, for I focus on older Russian military firearms, such as the Mosin-Nagant 1891/30 and it’s many variants. A group that doesn’t involve it’s self much in politics would be nice as well. Any suggestions?

By the way, I’m stuck in California, so no state-specific ones, please.

Posted in military firearms | 3 Comments »

What is the reason so many Serial Killers are ex- Military?

February 10th, 2010 by eranio

Military training links string of serial killers

By DOUG SAUNDERS\

Toronto Globe & Mail

Some time after he was discharged from the army, his life turned sour, he got angry and delusional and he snapped. Wielding his gun in a suburban neighbourhood, he killed again and again: women, children, complete strangers, with military precision but without an evident motive…

This describes what police say about John Allen Muhammad, who was arrested yesterday in the Washington sniper-killing rampage. But it is also a precise description of Howard Unruh, a 28-year-old Second World War veteran who shot 13 of his New Jersey neighbours one day in 1949. His military firearms training made his "walk of death" the first modern serial-killer case.

In the 53 years that separate Mr. Unruh from Mr. Muhammad, hundreds of Americans have lost their minds and used guns to cause multiple deaths. One thing unites almost all of them: military training.

Mr. Muhammad served in the Persian Gulf war, as did Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber. Both received weapons training and basic military training designed to psychologically condition soldiers to kill. They are far from alone.

Serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer received military training in Texas and Alabama. David Berkowitz, the "Son of Sam" killer, was an army veteran. Charles Whitman, who killed 16 people and injured 31 in a 1961 sniper-shooting rampage from the top of a tower in Austin, Tex., had just been discharged from the U.S. Marines. Arthur Shawcross, who killed 12 people, was a Vietnam veteran.

In an overwhelming number of cases, serial killers and other mass murderers learned to kill in the military. Experts disagree whether this means that the army turns ordinary people into unfeeling killers, or the military simply attracts a large number of psychologically fragile people who are prone to become murderers.

David Grossman, a former U.S. military psychologist who helped develop programs to train new recruits to become more effective killers, said that the key to military training lies in breaking down the natural human aversion to killing in a process he calls "disengagement." Once this aversion has been removed, it never comes back, and can make it easier for former soldiers to become murderers.

"The ability to watch a human being’s head explode and to do it again and again — that takes a kind of desensitization to human suffering that has to be learned," Mr. Grossman said yesterday.

In earlier wars, many soldiers were psychologically unable to shoot anyone. In order to increase the "trigger-pull ratio," the United States changed the basic training offered to all recruits and draftees so they would be aggressively desensitized to killing.

Some observers believe this may be why mass murders have become far more common in the past 50 years.

In the 1970s, some observers believed that the humiliation and social opprobrium caused by the Vietnam War, led many former soldiers to become mentally unstable, and potentially to become killers.

The Persian Gulf war of 1991 showed that this might not have been the case. Their war was popular domestically, and Persian Gulf veterans were welcomed as heroes upon return.

Yet their conflict has produced more than its share of killers. Mr. McVeigh was a decorated tank commander. His case is strikingly similar to that of Mr. Muhammad.

Both seem to have gradually developed anti-American or antigovernment beliefs while serving in the Persian Gulf war; both seem to have left disillusioned. And both seem to have used their military training to commit grave crimes.

Posted in military firearms | 16 Comments »

Are there any good pro American rock bands?

January 30th, 2010 by eranio

Besides Nuge, that is. So many of them (Rage against the machine, Green Day) have horrible lyrics, and I don’t really like country….
Bands that have a positive view of the military, firearms, business.
The thing is- Green day IS the establishment! They’re showing the same views as the rest of the media! I mean REAL conservatives! They are the TRUE rebels. I mean that’s what conservatism is all about! Getting rid of as much of the Government as possible and relying upon yourself!

Posted in military firearms | 7 Comments »

Why are 80% of serial killers ex-military?

January 29th, 2010 by eranio

Some time after he was discharged from the army, his life turned sour, he got angry and delusional and he snapped. Wielding his gun in a suburban neighbourhood, he killed again and again: women, children, complete strangers, with military precision but without an evident motive…

This describes what police say about John Allen Muhammad, who was arrested yesterday in the Washington sniper-killing rampage. But it is also a precise description of Howard Unruh, a 28-year-old Second World War veteran who shot 13 of his New Jersey neighbours one day in 1949. His military firearms training made his "walk of death" the first modern serial-killer case.

In the 53 years that separate Mr. Unruh from Mr. Muhammad, hundreds of Americans have lost their minds and used guns to cause multiple deaths. One thing unites almost all of them: military training.

Mr. Muhammad served in the Persian Gulf war, as did Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber. Both received weapons training and basic military training designed to psychologically condition soldiers to kill. They are far from alone.

Serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer received military training in Texas and Alabama. David Berkowitz, the "Son of Sam" killer, was an army veteran. Charles Whitman, who killed 16 people and injured 31 in a 1961 sniper-shooting rampage from the top of a tower in Austin, Tex., had just been discharged from the U.S. Marines. Arthur Shawcross, who killed 12 people, was a Vietnam veteran.

In an overwhelming number of cases, serial killers and other mass murderers learned to kill in the military. Experts disagree whether this means that the army turns ordinary people into unfeeling killers, or the military simply attracts a large number of psychologically fragile people who are prone to become murderers.

David Grossman, a former U.S. military psychologist who helped develop programs to train new recruits to become more effective killers, said that the key to military training lies in breaking down the natural human aversion to killing in a process he calls "disengagement." Once this aversion has been removed, it never comes back, and can make it easier for former soldiers to become murderers.

"The ability to watch a human being’s head explode and to do it again and again — that takes a kind of desensitization to human suffering that has to be learned," Mr. Grossman said yesterday.

In earlier wars, many soldiers were psychologically unable to shoot anyone. In order to increase the "trigger-pull ratio," the United States changed the basic training offered to all recruits and draftees so they would be aggressively desensitized to killing.

Some observers believe this may be why mass murders have become far more common in the past 50 years.

In the 1970s, some observers believed that the humiliation and social opprobrium caused by the Vietnam War, led many former soldiers to become mentally unstable, and potentially to become killers.

The Persian Gulf war of 1991 showed that this might not have been the case. Their war was popular domestically, and Persian Gulf veterans were welcomed as heroes upon return.

Yet their conflict has produced more than its share of killers. Mr. McVeigh was a decorated tank commander. His case is strikingly similar to that of Mr. Muhammad.

Both seem to have gradually developed anti-American or antigovernment beliefs while serving in the Persian Gulf war; both seem to have left disillusioned. And both seem to have used their military training to commit grave crimes.

Posted in military firearms | 12 Comments »

What are Cheep decent priced Guns to buy?

January 23rd, 2010 by eranio

im a gun collecter more along the lines of military firearms, but i do own a few shotguns. well im wondering what can i buy from under 275 thats worth buying. i got a 410, 20 gauge , 22LR , and a 1935 Mosin Nagant. Im interested in purchaceing a cheep SKS and spending a little cash now and again to add on. Thats anoth

Posted in military firearms | 3 Comments »

What is the reason so many Serial Killers are ex- Military?

January 20th, 2010 by eranio

Military training links string of serial killers

By DOUG SAUNDERS\

Toronto Globe & Mail

Some time after he was discharged from the army, his life turned sour, he got angry and delusional and he snapped. Wielding his gun in a suburban neighbourhood, he killed again and again: women, children, complete strangers, with military precision but without an evident motive…

This describes what police say about John Allen Muhammad, who was arrested yesterday in the Washington sniper-killing rampage. But it is also a precise description of Howard Unruh, a 28-year-old Second World War veteran who shot 13 of his New Jersey neighbours one day in 1949. His military firearms training made his "walk of death" the first modern serial-killer case.

In the 53 years that separate Mr. Unruh from Mr. Muhammad, hundreds of Americans have lost their minds and used guns to cause multiple deaths. One thing unites almost all of them: military training.

Mr. Muhammad served in the Persian Gulf war, as did Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber. Both received weapons training and basic military training designed to psychologically condition soldiers to kill. They are far from alone.

Serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer received military training in Texas and Alabama. David Berkowitz, the "Son of Sam" killer, was an army veteran. Charles Whitman, who killed 16 people and injured 31 in a 1961 sniper-shooting rampage from the top of a tower in Austin, Tex., had just been discharged from the U.S. Marines. Arthur Shawcross, who killed 12 people, was a Vietnam veteran.

In an overwhelming number of cases, serial killers and other mass murderers learned to kill in the military. Experts disagree whether this means that the army turns ordinary people into unfeeling killers, or the military simply attracts a large number of psychologically fragile people who are prone to become murderers.

David Grossman, a former U.S. military psychologist who helped develop programs to train new recruits to become more effective killers, said that the key to military training lies in breaking down the natural human aversion to killing in a process he calls "disengagement." Once this aversion has been removed, it never comes back, and can make it easier for former soldiers to become murderers.

"The ability to watch a human being’s head explode and to do it again and again — that takes a kind of desensitization to human suffering that has to be learned," Mr. Grossman said yesterday.

In earlier wars, many soldiers were psychologically unable to shoot anyone. In order to increase the "trigger-pull ratio," the United States changed the basic training offered to all recruits and draftees so they would be aggressively desensitized to killing.

Some observers believe this may be why mass murders have become far more common in the past 50 years.

In the 1970s, some observers believed that the humiliation and social opprobrium caused by the Vietnam War, led many former soldiers to become mentally unstable, and potentially to become killers.

The Persian Gulf war of 1991 showed that this might not have been the case. Their war was popular domestically, and Persian Gulf veterans were welcomed as heroes upon return.

Yet their conflict has produced more than its share of killers. Mr. McVeigh was a decorated tank commander. His case is strikingly similar to that of Mr. Muhammad.

Both seem to have gradually developed anti-American or antigovernment beliefs while serving in the Persian Gulf war; both seem to have left disillusioned. And both seem to have used their military training to commit grave crimes.

Posted in military firearms | 12 Comments »

Why are 80% of serial killers ex-military?

January 19th, 2010 by eranio

Some time after he was discharged from the army, his life turned sour, he got angry and delusional and he snapped. Wielding his gun in a suburban neighbourhood, he killed again and again: women, children, complete strangers, with military precision but without an evident motive…

This describes what police say about John Allen Muhammad, who was arrested yesterday in the Washington sniper-killing rampage. But it is also a precise description of Howard Unruh, a 28-year-old Second World War veteran who shot 13 of his New Jersey neighbours one day in 1949. His military firearms training made his "walk of death" the first modern serial-killer case.

In the 53 years that separate Mr. Unruh from Mr. Muhammad, hundreds of Americans have lost their minds and used guns to cause multiple deaths. One thing unites almost all of them: military training.

Mr. Muhammad served in the Persian Gulf war, as did Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber. Both received weapons training and basic military training designed to psychologically condition soldiers to kill. They are far from alone.

Serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer received military training in Texas and Alabama. David Berkowitz, the "Son of Sam" killer, was an army veteran. Charles Whitman, who killed 16 people and injured 31 in a 1961 sniper-shooting rampage from the top of a tower in Austin, Tex., had just been discharged from the U.S. Marines. Arthur Shawcross, who killed 12 people, was a Vietnam veteran.

In an overwhelming number of cases, serial killers and other mass murderers learned to kill in the military. Experts disagree whether this means that the army turns ordinary people into unfeeling killers, or the military simply attracts a large number of psychologically fragile people who are prone to become murderers.

David Grossman, a former U.S. military psychologist who helped develop programs to train new recruits to become more effective killers, said that the key to military training lies in breaking down the natural human aversion to killing in a process he calls "disengagement." Once this aversion has been removed, it never comes back, and can make it easier for former soldiers to become murderers.

"The ability to watch a human being’s head explode and to do it again and again — that takes a kind of desensitization to human suffering that has to be learned," Mr. Grossman said yesterday.

In earlier wars, many soldiers were psychologically unable to shoot anyone. In order to increase the "trigger-pull ratio," the United States changed the basic training offered to all recruits and draftees so they would be aggressively desensitized to killing.

Some observers believe this may be why mass murders have become far more common in the past 50 years.

In the 1970s, some observers believed that the humiliation and social opprobrium caused by the Vietnam War, led many former soldiers to become mentally unstable, and potentially to become killers.

The Persian Gulf war of 1991 showed that this might not have been the case. Their war was popular domestically, and Persian Gulf veterans were welcomed as heroes upon return.

Yet their conflict has produced more than its share of killers. Mr. McVeigh was a decorated tank commander. His case is strikingly similar to that of Mr. Muhammad.

Both seem to have gradually developed anti-American or antigovernment beliefs while serving in the Persian Gulf war; both seem to have left disillusioned. And both seem to have used their military training to commit grave crimes.

Posted in military firearms | 14 Comments »

Would the military be good for me?

January 18th, 2010 by eranio

I am in college now and I plan on getting my bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering and then a masters degree. I fell like I need to serve time in the military for the people of the U.S. and so I can really deserve to live in this country. I was born here but I don’t feel like I deserve the right to live in a free society while others are risking their lives and most never even get a chance.

I don’t want to have a desk job in the military and I don’t want a random tech job or something. I really would like to be a Navy Seal but I know I will have to work hard before I even get there. I would like to be a combat soldier. At least I think I do…I don’t have any idea what it would be like or if it would be a good or bad choice.

What options do I have? Would the military be a good thing for me or should I just stick to the civilian world and get a career in engineering? I like collecting and shooting military firearms but I don’t want to be some poser who thinks they are tough stuff because they bring their AR-15 to the range in military fatigues but doesn’t have a clue about military service.

I am on the fence about this one.
O, just for the record, I am not that poser. I don’t own an AR-15 or wear fatigues when I go to the range. I own WW2 military firearms.

Posted in military firearms | 2 Comments »

What was your reason for going Infantry?

January 4th, 2010 by eranio

I want to be Infantry in the Army and my Reason is because, I want to serve my country, do something amazing, give back to God, and for adventure. Other reasons are because I like the military, firearms, and I’ve always said, I can do something or sit back and watch on CNN-forgot where I heard that.

Posted in military firearms | 5 Comments »

where can i buy military weapons?

November 14th, 2009 by eranio

Im just curious. where can i buy some real military firearms for recreation??? I talking about the M24, PSG1, heckler and koch weapons, AK 47, M16, any gun from anyplace in the world.

Posted in military weapons | 6 Comments »