October 7th, 2010 by eranio
know the current Warfare of the U.S. is different and difficult to combat when you compare it to the U.S. past wars. Heck The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan can not be considered real wars, cause we are fighting Guerilla’s instead of ordinary military armies with vehicles. Its usually considered Police Action instead of regular warfare. I am sure if you took history you would know what the term Police Action means. Yeah, the Taliban had tanks well until we attacked them and destroyed all their tanks in combat. Back to the point, i heard about the new MRAP vehicles but how about tanks which could also be bomb proof. I heard that they are bomb resistant I wonder if that also includes sucide car bombs to. They said it was resistant to IED’s but they never said anything about RPG, are they also RPG proof. How about Generades anything Generade proof. Well based on the info from Wikipedia, RPGs are very effective against unarmored or lightly armored vehicles such as armored personnel carriers (APCs). The new bomb proof MRAP vehicles are heavily-armored, but that does not answer my question. I don’t believe that the new MRAP vehicles are 100 percent resistant to bombs, but they will contribute to a Possibility of an increasingly large reduction in U.S. army casualities in warfare. Compared to the old or should i say current military vehicles they won’t wear as quick in fact i predict that they these vehicles could take a far long time to wear when being exposed to IEDs. It will take whole alot of IEDs just to destroy one bomb proof military vehicle, imagine insurgents will never get enough time to make the bombs strong enough to destroy the new bomb proof military vehicles. So we all know that insurgents know the risk of attempting to attack our troops with rifles that is why they rely so heavily on the IEDs and other bombs cause they know they can’t beat us in conventional warfare.
Share This
Posted in Military Rifles | 3 Comments »
September 9th, 2010 by eranio
Did the Israeli defense force use American weapons to attack the Liberty?. Is this the first time U.S military weapons was used by a foreign army to destroy U.S army imp equity and civilian casualties?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
Share This
Posted in military weapons | 1 Comment »
September 5th, 2010 by eranio
Did the Israeli defense force use American weapons to attack the Liberty?. For Histories archiving Is this the first time U.S military weapons was used by a foreign army to destroy U.S army imp equity and civilian casualties? Thank you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
Share This
Posted in military weapons | 4 Comments »
July 13th, 2010 by eranio
What equipment is used by U.S Army Military Police? Do they carry pistols (sidearms) if so what kind, do they carry knives if so what kind, do they carry machine guns or rifles if so what kind, etc? Also what equipment is used by U.S Army Military Police Officers (31). Do they carry pistols (sidearms or primary weapon) if so what kind, do they carry knives if so what kind, do they carry machine guns or rifles (primary weapons) if so what kind, etc?
Share This
Posted in Military Rifles | 1 Comment »
February 7th, 2010 by eranio
And why is it his fault, isn’t there supposed to be someone else who is in charge of military weapons. Like the top general in the U.S army.
Share This
Posted in military weapons | 5 Comments »
January 29th, 2010 by eranio
U.S. Military Weapons Inscribed With Secret ‘Jesus’ Bible Codes
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/us-military-weapons-inscribed-secret-jesus-bible-codes/story?id=9575794
Coded references to New Testament Bible passages about Jesus Christ are inscribed on high-powered rifle sights provided to the United States military by a Michigan company, an ABC News investigation has found.
The sights are used by U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and in the training of Iraqi and Afghan soldiers. The maker of the sights, Trijicon, has a 0 million multi-year contract to provide up to 800,000 sights to the Marine Corps, and additional contracts to provide sights to the U.S. Army.
U.S. military rules specifically prohibit the proselytizing of any religion in Iraq or Afghanistan and were drawn up in order to prevent criticism that the U.S. was embarked on a religious "Crusade" in its war against al Qaeda and Iraqi insurgents.
How do you think this goes down in Muslim countrues and is this just not further evidence that Bush started holy wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Share This
Posted in military weapons | 9 Comments »