<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What guns for the US Military?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:44:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>first...the standard rifle

A Garand action built around a 6MM cartridge similar to what Garand built the M1 around in the first place.
The actual rifle I&#039;d offer would be similar to a Ruger Mini 14 with a little more substantial stock. All would be set up to feed with stripper clips and the bayonet would be bigger than a steak knife

I can live with the M9 pistol... but I&#039;d change the spec back to 45 ACP... screw NATO

For other MOS&#039;s that cant use a auto pistol... (K9 guys and helio pilots and other aviation crews)... 3 inch SW heavy BBL K frames in ,357... even in FMJ that a good pistol to have in a pinch.

SOG keeps the current inventory of Barrets and Remington based sniper rifles

Shotguns... the M590&#039; gets it done.. why change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first&#8230;the standard rifle</p>
<p>A Garand action built around a 6MM cartridge similar to what Garand built the M1 around in the first place.<br />
The actual rifle I&#8217;d offer would be similar to a Ruger Mini 14 with a little more substantial stock. All would be set up to feed with stripper clips and the bayonet would be bigger than a steak knife</p>
<p>I can live with the M9 pistol&#8230; but I&#8217;d change the spec back to 45 ACP&#8230; screw NATO</p>
<p>For other MOS&#8217;s that cant use a auto pistol&#8230; (K9 guys and helio pilots and other aviation crews)&#8230; 3 inch SW heavy BBL K frames in ,357&#8230; even in FMJ that a good pistol to have in a pinch.</p>
<p>SOG keeps the current inventory of Barrets and Remington based sniper rifles</p>
<p>Shotguns&#8230; the M590&#8242; gets it done.. why change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimreaperon125</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>grimreaperon125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Hand guns would all be smith and wesson... M4s and M16A2 are the bast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hand guns would all be smith and wesson&#8230; M4s and M16A2 are the bast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zazen</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>zazen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>The current M4/M16 chambered in 6.8spc or in .270. If we&#039;re still limited to ball ammo then the handgun would have to go back to the 1911, either a &#039;loaded&#039; Springfield or a Kimber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current M4/M16 chambered in 6.8spc or in .270. If we&#8217;re still limited to ball ammo then the handgun would have to go back to the 1911, either a &#8216;loaded&#8217; Springfield or a Kimber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John de Witt</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>John de Witt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing wrong with the M-16 and M-4 except that they&#039;re on AR-15 frames. Switch to AR-10, and you could fit more than the 6.8 SPC into the chamber. Then, since our President is busy apologizing to the world about America&#039;s past sins, we could apologize to the British for squashing Enfield&#039;s excellent 280 cartridge 60 years ago, which led us down two wrong paths (7.62x51, then 5.56x45), and we could have a decent battle cartridge. As a matter of fact, we could contract with Hornady for some of their proprietary propellant loadings and possibly even make do with a slightly shorter case. Part of the apology would also be to supply UK with the same rifle, so their squaddies could gracefully retire those hideous bullpup SA-80&#039;s and have something that actually shoot when (and only when!) you press the trigger.
My thinking is similar with handguns, though they&#039;re much less important. Several agencies within the military already have good modern 45 ACP handguns, and there&#039;s always the problem of people who simply will never learn to handle a large-bore handgun. There&#039;s no need to change the handguns, simply let everyone have his choice of what&#039;s already available. It&#039;s the computer age, so past worries about logistics for handgun cartridges shouldn&#039;t be that big a problem now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with the M-16 and M-4 except that they&#8217;re on AR-15 frames. Switch to AR-10, and you could fit more than the 6.8 SPC into the chamber. Then, since our President is busy apologizing to the world about America&#8217;s past sins, we could apologize to the British for squashing Enfield&#8217;s excellent 280 cartridge 60 years ago, which led us down two wrong paths (7.62&#215;51, then 5.56&#215;45), and we could have a decent battle cartridge. As a matter of fact, we could contract with Hornady for some of their proprietary propellant loadings and possibly even make do with a slightly shorter case. Part of the apology would also be to supply UK with the same rifle, so their squaddies could gracefully retire those hideous bullpup SA-80&#8217;s and have something that actually shoot when (and only when!) you press the trigger.<br />
My thinking is similar with handguns, though they&#8217;re much less important. Several agencies within the military already have good modern 45 ACP handguns, and there&#8217;s always the problem of people who simply will never learn to handle a large-bore handgun. There&#8217;s no need to change the handguns, simply let everyone have his choice of what&#8217;s already available. It&#8217;s the computer age, so past worries about logistics for handgun cartridges shouldn&#8217;t be that big a problem now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ωą√ệĢﮟìđĕ</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>ωą√ệĢﮟìđĕ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>Main battle rifle, something with a 30 cal. Maybe take a hint from the soviets and use their 7.62x39.
Pistols, go back to the 1911 45acp.
shotguns, Keep what we have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Main battle rifle, something with a 30 cal. Maybe take a hint from the soviets and use their 7.62&#215;39.<br />
Pistols, go back to the 1911 45acp.<br />
shotguns, Keep what we have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack A</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>M-14 rifle 
M1911A1
.308 winchester


talking to old marines that is what they say that those were the best weapons that you can get for the military</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-14 rifle<br />
M1911A1<br />
.308 winchester</p>
<p>talking to old marines that is what they say that those were the best weapons that you can get for the military</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 ate 9</title>
		<link>http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html/comment-page-1#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>7 ate 9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militaryriflesforsale.net/what-guns-for-the-us-military.html#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>a AR-15 rifle in 6.8 or interchangeable between 5.56 NATO and 
7.62 x 39. have the soliders rated on handguns and see if they can handle a .45 ACP, if not then give them a 9mm. either a glock, taurus, or a springfield XD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a AR-15 rifle in 6.8 or interchangeable between 5.56 NATO and<br />
7.62 x 39. have the soliders rated on handguns and see if they can handle a .45 ACP, if not then give them a 9mm. either a glock, taurus, or a springfield XD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
